5 Reasons Pfizer’s Reply to President Trump Is Complete Rubbish
5 Reasons Pfizer’s Reply to President Trump Is Complete Rubbish
by Clayton J. Baker, MD at Brownstone Institute
On September 1, 2025, on Truth Social, President Trump posted a demand for transparency. Specifically, he called for public release of the data he has received from pharmaceutical companies regarding the modified-mRNA-based Covid injections, calling out Pfizer specifically. He wrote:
It is very important that the Drug Companies justify the success of their various Covid Drugs. Many people think they are a miracle that saved Millions of lives. Others disagree! With CDC being ripped apart over this question, I want the answer, and I want it NOW. I have been shown information from Pfizer, and others, that is extraordinary, but they never seem to show those results to the public. Why not??? … They show me GREAT numbers and results, but they don’t seem to be showing them to many others. I want them to show them NOW, to CDC and the public, and clear up this MESS, one way or the other!!!
In the same message, President Trump also publicly questioned the success of Operation Warp Speed.
On September 8, Pfizer put out a press release touting the results of Phase 3 trials for its newest version of its mRNA gene therapy for Covid for 2025-2026. It begins:
Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE today announced positive topline results from an ongoing Phase 3 clinical trial cohort evaluating the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a 30-µg dose of the LP.8.1-adapted monovalent COMIRNATY® (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) 2025-2026 Formula in adults aged 65 and older and in adults aged 18 through 64 with at least one underlying risk condition for severe COVID-19. The preliminary data show a robust increase in neutralizing antibodies targeting the LP.8.1 sublineage of SARS-CoV-2 following vaccination.
Pfizer’s document is rife with deception, which comes as no surprise, given Pfizer’s long history of fraud and criminality. However, it is instructive to review the press release, as it reveals several of the deceptive tricks of the trade frequently used in the vaccine industry.
Here are my Top 5 Reasons Pfizer’s Reply to President Trump Is Complete Rubbish. They are:
- Pfizer’s Long History of Criminality and Fraud
- An Antibody Response Does Not Equal Immunity
- Chasing Respiratory Viruses with Vaccines Is Futile
- Claims of Safety Are Unsupported
- Covid Does Not Merit Boosters
Pfizer’s Long History of Criminality and Fraud
Long before Covid, Pfizer had established itself as one of the most prolifically criminal corporations in history, with a rap sheet that would make British Petroleum blush. Since 2000, Pfizer and its subsidiaries have been found guilty of 107 offenses totaling a staggering $11,261,560,400.
That’s right: over one hundred violations, totaling over $11 billion in penalties. At least 22 of those were violations of the False Claims Act – meaning Pfizer has been found guilty of defrauding the government an astonishing 22 times in the last 25 years.
The Pfizer press release provides only a summary of their studies. It does not include the raw data, as President Trump ordered. The press release merely states “Companies have submitted these data to the FDA.” In this respect it completely fails to answer the President’s appeal for transparency.
Pfizer ends its press release with an 1,100-word italicized disclaimer that begins with the following:
The information contained in this release is as of September 8, 2025. Pfizer assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements contained in this release as the result of new information or future events or developments.
To my reading, this disclaimer essentially states: We are guessing about the future here, and this press release could turn out to be a load of horse crap. We accept no responsibility to correct ourselves if that turns out to be the case.
Do you trust Pfizer’s reported results? If so, I can get you a sweet deal on a bridge between Brooklyn and Manhattan. Let us hope and pray the President and his advisors keep in mind exactly whom they are dealing with here, and how this document utterly fails to provide the transparency the President seeks.
An Antibody Response Does Not Equal Immunity
Let’s assume Pfizer is telling the truth this time. (I realize that’s quite an assumption, but humor me for a moment.) Let’s say Pfizer’s 2025-2026 version of the Covid shot does produce “at least a 4-fold increase in LP.8.1-neutralizing antibody titers,” as the press release claims.
So what?
If their claim sounds obscure, it’s because it is. It does not, as Pfizer claims,
reinforce pre-clinical data that supported the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the LP.8.1-adapted COVID-19 vaccine, which demonstratedimproved [sic] immune responses against multiple circulating SARS-CoV-2 sublineages.
Equating antibody production with “immune response” is an intellectually dishonest linguistic sleight-of-hand that is all too typical in the world of vaccines.
Antibody production, robust or not, is no guarantee of clinically relevant immunity. Not at all. The assertion that if a vaccine invokes a strong antibody response, it will therefore protect you from catching, spreading, or getting sick from an illness is a faulty inference based on false premises.
Equating antibody production with immunity is one of the foundational lies of vaccinology. It’s like a greedy, overzealous sports agent declaring his 18-year-old pitching prospect to be a perennial Major League All-Star, simply because he can chuck the ball at 98 miles per hour.
The kid may have a strong arm. But if he can’t throw a strike, he’s useless.
The human immune system is extremely complex, beyond the understanding of humanity as a whole, much less the likes of an Albert Bourla, a Paul Offit, or any other vaccine zealot you care to name. Antibodies are just one of the elements of the immune response to infection. An important one, but just one.
Remember that, contrary to the repeated claims of Pfizer, Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, the legacy media, and Joe “winter of severe illness and death” Biden himself, the original Pfizer Covid shots did not prevent recipients from catching or spreading the virus. Those shots produced a vigorous antibody response, too. But they didn’t do what we were told repeatedly that they would do. Not even close.
Chasing Respiratory Viruses with Vaccines Is Futile
Even if antibodies were enough to provide immunity, the antibodies that a vaccine stimulates production of in your body have to match the intended part of the virus – the antigen – to have a beneficial effect. If the virus mutates sufficiently while the product is in development, the vaccine-induced antibodies, designed for the old version of the target antigen, won’t recognize the new, mutated version of the antigen to which they are supposed to attach. In a word, they won’t “stick,” and they won’t do their intended job.
Small, simple RNA-based respiratory viruses, like the one that causes Covid, influenza, and most common colds, mutate rapidly and constantly. When we hear about the latest “variant” of Covid, this refers to the most recent product of this constant evolutionary process.
When it comes to simple, rapidly mutating viruses like SARS-CoV-2 or influenza, vaccine developers are like a would-be fashionista who only shops at Filene’s Basement. They are forever caught in a futile chase to keep up-to-date, although they only have access to last season’s designs.
However, if manufacturers like Pfizer can market their products effectively enough, this fatal flaw becomes a feature, not a bug. Provided Pfizer can keep people convinced they need repeated boosters, seasonal vaccines represent an unbeatable business model. Liability-free medicines for healthy people? Cha-ching! Inject every man, woman, and child, every year, on an endless subscription model? Cha-ching!
In reality, respiratory viruses have us beat with regard to vaccines. They’re too nimble and quick to keep up with. Vaccines end up as weapons suited only for fighting the last war.
Best to cover your cough, wash your hands, and let your immune system do what it does best on its own. (Not to mention, stop gain-of-functioning harmless viruses into deadly bioweapons.) But where’s the money in that?
Claims of Safety Are Unsupported
Pfizer’s press release states that “The safety profile of the vaccine was consistent with previous studies, with no new safety concerns identified.”
Sounds good? Hang on just a second. The press release also states that
- only 100 participants were enrolled
- data was only obtained from “evaluable participants” without stating how many dropouts occurred
- the study was conducted over a 14-day period
- the safety profile of the vaccine “was consistent with previous studies,” without stating what the previous studies showed
Here we go again with more of the classic chicanery typical of vaccine studies.
“Safety” cannot be established on the basis of a pitifully small study of fewer than one hundred subjects, followed for a mere 2 weeks.
“Safety” cannot be established simply by stating the findings were “consistent” with “previous studies” without telling us the findings of the previous studies.
“Safety” cannot be determined without comparison against a true placebo.
Pfizer’s glossing over of the issue of “safety” in this press release would be comical if we did not know the extent of vaccine-related injuries and deaths associated with the earlier versions of the Covid-modified mRNA injections.
Covid Does Not Merit Boosters
Let me put it bluntly: the SARS-CoV-2 virus simply doesn’t merit a vaccine anymore – if indeed it ever did. By now, this fact is not just an elephant in the room. It is a giant bull tusker trumpeting at top volume.
In late 2019, SARS-CoV-2 was released from the laboratory into the human population. Yes, it was a gain-of-function engineered virus. Yes, it was initially dangerous to the elderly and to persons with severe underlying conditions.
However, like all living things, viruses evolve in a manner that best suits their own survival and reproduction. With the consistency of a natural law, viral evolution – especially in simple, rapidly-mutating viruses like SARS-CoV-2 – unfailingly favors mutations that render the pathogen less deadly to its host, yet more transmissible between individual hosts.
This makes perfect evolutionary sense, of course. Through mutation and natural selection, the virus learns to live with its host, rather than killing it. Whether you’re a human being or a virus, it does no good for you or your children to move into a new home and promptly burn it to the ground.
In other words, as we all know intuitively after the past 5 years, SARS-CoV-2 has evolved from behaving like a lab-engineered bioweapon to another common cold virus – which is exactly what other existing coronaviruses are.
The data confirm this as well. A new CDC report of 2024 data states that Covid is no longer among the top-10 causes of death in the United States. Suicide, the tenth-ranked cause for 2024 was attributed to 48,000 deaths. Authors of the report have been unrevealing about the exact number of deaths attributed to Covid, or to its exact rank, elusively stating only that “It’s still in the top 15.”
We are left to conclude that the Covid death count for 2024 is definitely below 48,000, possibly much lower. Given the “experts’” reluctance to give us the exact number, and given that it may well be as low as 15 on the list, it is very possible it is much lower than that.
Before we jump to credit the modified mRNA injections for this decrease, note that vaccine booster acceptance rates for the Covid injections have plummeted. In late 2023, one month after the then-new Covid boosters were released with heavy promotion, only 7% of adults and 2% of children got the boosters, an acceptance rate that “experts” referred to as “abysmal.”
Nevertheless, Covid fell off the list of leading causes of death the following year.
Summary
Pfizer’s reply to President Trump’s very reasonable call for transparency of data regarding their latest edition of their modified-mRNA Covid injections is nothing less than an insult to the intelligence of every reader, including the President himself.
It appears that while Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla was cynically flattering President Trump by calling for a Nobel Prize for Operation Warp Speed, Pfizer was trying to fool the President, and all Americans, with this deceptive document.
May President Trump see through all this dishonesty. May he recognize Pfizer’s response to his call for honesty and transparency for what it is: complete rubbish.
5 Reasons Pfizer’s Reply to President Trump Is Complete Rubbish
by Clayton J. Baker, MD at Brownstone Institute – Daily Economics, Policy, Public Health, Society